View on GitHub

Science-Fallacies

How the Scientific Establishment Generates Bad Science, and What We Can Do About It

Popular Science Reporting

Consider:

As one might expect, there is a strong filter for overstatement of results, grandstanding, pandering, and controversy.

As might be expected, constant flip-flopping on issues such as diet undermines people’s view of the scientific results as facts. This volatility of reported facts translates into skeptical views on evolution, global warming, vaccines, and similar issues where science is relatively conclusive.

Indeed, even within those fields, dishonest reporting undermines the credibility of science. We see articles disproving older predictions of global warming, where academics sought coverage by overstating results.

This gives a genuine reason to distrust the scientific establishment as an authority.

Consider how we might address issues around science reporting and publicity, both with regards to newspaper reporting, and with regards to book publishing and publicity. Consider both reporters’ incentives and those of scientists.